This communication is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or professional advice. ACCR does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence and does not provide financial product advice. The purpose of this communication is not to provide financial product advice. Please read the terms and conditions attached to the use of this site.

Key Insights

  • BHP has deferred much of the investment required to decarbonise its operations this decade, reducing investor visibility over a credible pathway to net zero by 2050.
  • BHP’s actions no longer appear consistent with its ambition to “lead the evolution of [the mining] industry”.[1] This change in ambition reflects more than technology delays. It has delayed, curtailed or stopped several of its key decarbonisation projects,[2],[3] and deferred 87.5% of planned operational decarbonisation spend this decade.[3:1]
  • While BHP has met its modest 2030 operational target largely through renewable power agreements in Chile, only 4% of emissions reductions made have been from Australian operations and there is heavy lifting ahead.
  • With no interim targets between 2030 and 2050, BHP lacks a clear accountability framework to guide capital allocation and track delivery towards its 2050 net zero commitment.
  • Diesel displacement remains a major decarbonisation challenge. As Australian policy evolves, and rebates for diesel use face increasing scrutiny, BHP may be caught flat-footed if it is not prepared for changing transition economics and policy settings.
  • Preparing for transition now – through investing in enabling infrastructure, building workforce capability and preserving optionality to electrify as technologies mature – is critical to reducing cumulative emissions and managing future costs.
  • Investors can help drive improvements by encouraging BHP to provide greater transparency about its decarbonisation plans, to adopt a medium-term operational emissions target and to increase accountability for delivery against that target.

Key stewardship considerations for investors

The following questions should be incorporated into future engagement meetings to better understand the risks associated with BHP’s current strategy:

  • Will the company commit to a medium-term operational emissions target, supported by a cumulative operational emissions budget to enable stronger accountability in capital allocation decisions?
  • Will BHP disclose its fleet replacement strategy, deployment timelines and implementation milestones?
  • How is BHP ensuring that enabling infrastructure, renewable energy investment and operational readiness are progressing in parallel with fleet electrification?
  • Will the company align executive incentives and capital allocation frameworks with delivery against post-2030 decarbonisation objectives?

  1. Mike Henry, BHP, Climate Change Report, 2020, p. 2, https://www.bhp.com/-/media/documents/investors/annual-reports/2020/200910_bhpclimatechangereport2020.pdf. ↩︎

  2. Christopher Knaus and Adam Morton, The Guardian, World’s biggest miner BHP backtracks on climate action with key projects put on ice, leaked documents reveal, 25 May 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/25/bhp-files-leak-mining-company-climate-action; ABC Four Corners, The BHP Files, Video, 25 May 2026, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-25/the-bhp-files/106720178. ↩︎

  3. BHP, Annual Report, 2025, p. 42, https://www.bhp.com/-/media/documents/investors/annual-reports/2025/250819_bhpannualreport2025.pdf. ↩︎ ↩︎

16th July 2026

Publication Information

Download Publication
  • 5 MB PDF
  • 16th July 2026